Skip to main content

NuClear


Last Friday I did what I do most Friday nights – watch the PBS NewsHour for Shields & Brooks. While mainly I appreciate their analysis, at times, and for me, this is one of those times, I find them out of step with the populace. This has to do with the comments Samantha Bee used to describe Ivanka Trump recently. Shields claimed the word was “nuclear,” and that there was no worse word that could be used in regard to women.
My husband had been at a Fringe festival show, so had missed it, and streamed that portion of the show later. I was just as baffled then as I was Friday night, since all I could think about the original phrase was: “yep, that’s Ivanka.” Maybe all those years of Deadwood and the Sopranos have caused me to be immune to the power of such a word.
I think I also feel that Ivanka is one of the worst types of hypocrites for women. She’s claims she’s a modern woman and understands working women, yet she lives a completely 1% gilded life. Plus, her father’s a misogynist pig who, along with his fellow Republicans, wants to take all the rights women have worked so hard to gain over the years away. I don’t think the reason she doesn’t have 12 kids is due to abstinence, nor do I feel any sympathy for her when she says her day is ruined when one of her kids gets sick (How many nannies and assistants does she have? More importantly, how many aides do real working women have?).
In some ways the real issue is that the word bothers people of Shield’s generation (and Brooks’ and clearly Judy Woodruff’s). Up until the 2000s, I don’t remember it being heard as much. I don’t know, other than TV shows, why that would be, but I do think context matters. Just like I cringe as a white liberal woman when I hear the n-word, the use of the c-word means a lot depending on who uses it.
Ted Nugent called Hillary this word and got invited to the White House by Trump, who I’m sure has used this word. It didn’t look like Sarah Palin had problems with Nugent using that word from the photos taken of the three of them together. If it’s okay to use the word against Hillary, why can’t the democrats use it against such a useless hanger-on and recipient of way too much support by her father like Ivanka?
Again, context is key. A male white supremacist and sexist calling the Democratic Presidential nominee that word is nuclear. A female progressive with a TV show that does its best to call out hypocrisy and stupidity by the government and media using such a word to aptly describe the President’s enabling daughter has power, but for the better good (or at least it is for me).

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Clueless White Privilege

I should state up front that I am a white woman, and compared to many in this country I would be considered privileged. There have certainly been times in my life that I didn’t fully grasp that and said and did things that make me cringe now, wondering how I could have been so unaware, but I never had the power mixed with that cluelessness to affect the lives of so many people in such drastic ways. The U.S. Supreme Court does have that power, and appears to have a majority of clueless wonders that are about to do just that. Depending on what poll you look at, anywhere from half the country to three-quarters support the right of a woman to control what happens to her body (i.e. get an abortion), yet it looks very much like that long-held civil right will be taken away by what, I view, is absolute cluelessness of the world we live in, and with five of those justices being white, it really is impossible to not proclaim it white privilege after hearing their comments...
Read more

The Little Things

I still keep seething, not just about this election, but also the 2016 election. Last night I was on a webinar with other heartbroken women, who thought this time would be different. One woman mentioned that this all felt like PTSD. The meeting tried to focus on healing and giving space to mourn before getting out there again. And while I understand that need, it was not resonating for me. Just like the many ( many ) posts on my social media feed that keep spotlighting positive quotes and talk of self-care end up making me feel more angry. Instead, I find myself ruminating back to another election, not to 2016, but 1984. I came home from junior high one day to have my mother tell me that my father had registered to vote for the first time (if you know me and you’ve heard me tell this story or read a previous post about it, I’m sorry, but we all have things in our lives that get stuck). I think I hadn’t even realized he wasn’t registered to vote. It turns out he wasn’t excited to go vot...
Read more

Pro-Death

  I grew up in an evangelical church, and as soon as I could escape it, I did. I remember my mother talking longingly about the mansion she would have in heaven and, even at a young age, I felt uncomfortable hearing her talk about her life when she would be dead. It was as though she’d given up on anything good happening in this world, and only had the next life to look forward to. If you read the recent rulings from the Supreme Court it’s as if they’ve given up on anything good happening in this world too, but also are trying to hasten us all, in one way or another, to the “next world.” If the baby that you shouldn’t be carrying doesn’t kill you then the guns that they made even easier to get, and easier to carry around, will. Or if neither of those situations do you in, then tying the hands of the EPA to reign in pollution and other hazardous-to-our-health chemicals will. One of my own coping mechanisms may have some similarities – dreaming of living in another, better, count...
Read more