Skip to main content

My new least favorite word


There are so many new words and phrases that have been popping up over the last two years that I dislike, but I think none more than tribalism. Last night I was watching the PBS NewsHour, and while I generally appreciate the commentary of Shields & Brooks, I really wanted to throttle David Brooks when during the show he chalked up much of the problems with this week’s hearings to tribalism. At times he is able to rise above his political party affiliation, but to me this just showed that he’s another white guy that just doesn’t get it.
Wikipedia says tribalism is the state of being organized by, or advocating for, tribes or tribal lifestyles. In my opinion, that is not the problem because what we’re mostly seeing is differences between how women see things (and what they’ve experienced first hand) and how men (especially white privileged men) see them. We’re also seeing angry men striking back at women for the MeToo movement and for their chipping away at the long-held patriarchal system. Granted, there are many enlightened men who have evolved past their natural state, just as sadly a number of partisan women have shown recently that they’re willing to throw their daughters under the bus to save this deeply flawed nominee.
To me a tribe is much smaller than one whole gender population. David Brooks’ own paper, The New York Times, printed reactions from people across the globe, including many women finally coming forward with their own sexual assault stories, and realizing years later that what happened to them hadn’t been their fault. In last night’s PBS NewsHour broadcast, linguist Deborah Tannen highlighted the fact that Ford and Kavanaugh spoke at the hearings in very typical female and male ways, with Ford being polite and self-effacing, while Kavanaugh was belligerent and confrontational. Many others have pointed out that if Ford had behaved the way Kavanaugh had, she would have been labeled an angry, hysterical women, yet he apparently caused Trump to claim that the performance was exactly why he chose him as the nominee.
For Brooks, he said he came away from the hearing believing them both, which utterly baffles me, and not because I’m in a tribe, but because I’m a woman. I’ve learned over the years that being the gender I am, that I’m not supposed to speak up for myself or raise my or make men feel uncomfortable. Whereas men learn to fight for themselves, to take what they want, and disregard others that stand in their way. For me, I believed Dr. Ford, and after Kavanaugh’s performance, I believed he was guilty of the accusations presented.
That’s not tribalism and it’s not how things should be, but until more men evolve, learn to reflect, and willingly take responsibility for their actions, than sadly nothing will change. Saying this hearing was partisanship or tribalism makes light of sexual assault and people who use these excuses really should do some soul searching.

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Clueless White Privilege

I should state up front that I am a white woman, and compared to many in this country I would be considered privileged. There have certainly been times in my life that I didn’t fully grasp that and said and did things that make me cringe now, wondering how I could have been so unaware, but I never had the power mixed with that cluelessness to affect the lives of so many people in such drastic ways. The U.S. Supreme Court does have that power, and appears to have a majority of clueless wonders that are about to do just that. Depending on what poll you look at, anywhere from half the country to three-quarters support the right of a woman to control what happens to her body (i.e. get an abortion), yet it looks very much like that long-held civil right will be taken away by what, I view, is absolute cluelessness of the world we live in, and with five of those justices being white, it really is impossible to not proclaim it white privilege after hearing their comments...
Read more

The Little Things

I still keep seething, not just about this election, but also the 2016 election. Last night I was on a webinar with other heartbroken women, who thought this time would be different. One woman mentioned that this all felt like PTSD. The meeting tried to focus on healing and giving space to mourn before getting out there again. And while I understand that need, it was not resonating for me. Just like the many ( many ) posts on my social media feed that keep spotlighting positive quotes and talk of self-care end up making me feel more angry. Instead, I find myself ruminating back to another election, not to 2016, but 1984. I came home from junior high one day to have my mother tell me that my father had registered to vote for the first time (if you know me and you’ve heard me tell this story or read a previous post about it, I’m sorry, but we all have things in our lives that get stuck). I think I hadn’t even realized he wasn’t registered to vote. It turns out he wasn’t excited to go vot...
Read more

Pro-Death

  I grew up in an evangelical church, and as soon as I could escape it, I did. I remember my mother talking longingly about the mansion she would have in heaven and, even at a young age, I felt uncomfortable hearing her talk about her life when she would be dead. It was as though she’d given up on anything good happening in this world, and only had the next life to look forward to. If you read the recent rulings from the Supreme Court it’s as if they’ve given up on anything good happening in this world too, but also are trying to hasten us all, in one way or another, to the “next world.” If the baby that you shouldn’t be carrying doesn’t kill you then the guns that they made even easier to get, and easier to carry around, will. Or if neither of those situations do you in, then tying the hands of the EPA to reign in pollution and other hazardous-to-our-health chemicals will. One of my own coping mechanisms may have some similarities – dreaming of living in another, better, count...
Read more