Skip to main content

NuClear


Last Friday I did what I do most Friday nights – watch the PBS NewsHour for Shields & Brooks. While mainly I appreciate their analysis, at times, and for me, this is one of those times, I find them out of step with the populace. This has to do with the comments Samantha Bee used to describe Ivanka Trump recently. Shields claimed the word was “nuclear,” and that there was no worse word that could be used in regard to women.
My husband had been at a Fringe festival show, so had missed it, and streamed that portion of the show later. I was just as baffled then as I was Friday night, since all I could think about the original phrase was: “yep, that’s Ivanka.” Maybe all those years of Deadwood and the Sopranos have caused me to be immune to the power of such a word.
I think I also feel that Ivanka is one of the worst types of hypocrites for women. She’s claims she’s a modern woman and understands working women, yet she lives a completely 1% gilded life. Plus, her father’s a misogynist pig who, along with his fellow Republicans, wants to take all the rights women have worked so hard to gain over the years away. I don’t think the reason she doesn’t have 12 kids is due to abstinence, nor do I feel any sympathy for her when she says her day is ruined when one of her kids gets sick (How many nannies and assistants does she have? More importantly, how many aides do real working women have?).
In some ways the real issue is that the word bothers people of Shield’s generation (and Brooks’ and clearly Judy Woodruff’s). Up until the 2000s, I don’t remember it being heard as much. I don’t know, other than TV shows, why that would be, but I do think context matters. Just like I cringe as a white liberal woman when I hear the n-word, the use of the c-word means a lot depending on who uses it.
Ted Nugent called Hillary this word and got invited to the White House by Trump, who I’m sure has used this word. It didn’t look like Sarah Palin had problems with Nugent using that word from the photos taken of the three of them together. If it’s okay to use the word against Hillary, why can’t the democrats use it against such a useless hanger-on and recipient of way too much support by her father like Ivanka?
Again, context is key. A male white supremacist and sexist calling the Democratic Presidential nominee that word is nuclear. A female progressive with a TV show that does its best to call out hypocrisy and stupidity by the government and media using such a word to aptly describe the President’s enabling daughter has power, but for the better good (or at least it is for me).

Popular posts from this blog

Lack of Approval

    Perhaps the upside to a year of a pandemic is that there were less New Year’s resolution articles. Normally there would be tons of tips on how to choose and how best to keep your resolutions. There have been a few, but they are far gentler in their approach. After all, just surviving this year is accomplishment enough. Beating yourself up for not writing every day or losing more weight (or even keeping the weight off) just feels cruel right now.       Maybe these thoughts were what caused me to become so annoyed listening to a recent podcast where a writer talked about how important a particular teacher had been in her life. This is a common story – the teacher who saw in you what you couldn’t see, gave you the necessary tools, and then sent you forth to live your dream life. Mostly, I don’t think it’s true, but I am a pessimist.      For me it’s always the most negative comment or abusive teacher who stays in my mind, not the kind o...

The End of the World as We Know It

Mostly I like to think of myself as calm and composed, at least this was what I was before Trump took office. Every day there’s something new to worry and seethe about, and I really don’t know how much more I can take. The current Supreme Court vacancy just might be that proverbial last straw. I’m thankful that I’ve never had to make the choice to have an abortion, but I’m equally thankful to live in a country where it’s currently legal. If right-wing extremists have their way, that could easily change with a new composition of the Court . Of course, they seem focused on this being an isolated case, when it’s really not. Overturning Roe v. Wade will open up countless other supposedly decided issues, making this a very different and far less free country. Roe v. Wade isn’t just about abortion , but about whether the government has the right to control what women are allowed to do with their own bodies. Think about that sentence for a few minutes. How many of you, regardl...

Impatient

  A few weeks ago I was standing at the downtown square with lots of other women, holding signs and shouting. One woman had a sign saying that she couldn’t believe she was still having to fight for the right to control her body. I understand that sentiment. During that day, we rallied and listened to moving speeches, but I left not knowing what to do other than make what donations I could to various organizations helping with the fight. I also left the rally feeling slightly guilty, but fortunate, that I’d never been put in a situation where I either needed an abortion or had to help someone acquire one. When I was an adolescent I remember a neighbor telling my mother that her daughter-in-law was getting an abortion, not seeming to acknowledge that I was present, and maybe this wasn’t something I should be hearing. The woman and her husband had a child already, around my age, and they couldn’t afford another one. Strangely I don’t remember my mother having muc...